Why you should buy Berkshire instead of a S&P 500 ETF:
- Berkshire has a 0.9 beta, which means that it may hold up better than the S&P 500 in the case of a correction
- Berkshire has somewhat of a support level if the stock falls below the 1.2x book value threshold as such pricing may trigger a stock buyback program (Warren Buffet stated that 1.2x book value is a bargain compared to intrinsic value). The stock is currently priced at 1.27x book value. For the last ten years the stock has not been priced below 1.05x book value
- Berkshire holds huge amounts of cash which it is ready to deploy if a large market correction should occur. The investment company has a track record of being offered advantageous deals during downturns
- Berkshire has proved above average performance by following a simple investment strategy: To buy unique but simple businesses with strong positions in the market, with solid management at reasonable prices. The S&P 500 basically holds the 500 largest listed companies in the US, including the ones with weak business models and poor management
- Berkshire has proven over time the ability to grow their book value at a superior rate compared to the S&P 500. Although their absolute return performance has decreased as the group has grown larger, they still have a ROIC of 8.88 % vs. a WACC of 8.15 % meaning that their active investing still produces value above the cost of capital
- You avoid to invest in the "blue chips of the future" companies such as Amazon, Tesla, Netflix and Facebook which are partly responsible for the current bloated pricing of the S&P 500 with their stretched valuations
- And at last valuation:
Source: Gurufocus
Berkshire´s lower P/E does not reflect its superior ability to grow earnings over time
Source: Gurufocus
Disclosure: I am long BRK.B.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving any compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.